360 Degree Review Form Template
Collect multi-directional feedback on an employee's performance and behaviors. This template gathers structured input from managers, peers, direct reports, and self-assessments in one consistent format.
Annual performance reviews from a single manager give you a narrow view of how an employee is actually performing. Managers see certain behaviors, peers see others, and direct reports see something different again. Without a mechanism to capture all of that perspective, the review reflects one vantage point rather than a complete picture.
A 360 degree review form creates that complete picture. Respondents from each level of the employee's work relationships complete the same structured assessment — rating competencies, providing examples, and offering forward-looking suggestions — in a format that can be aggregated meaningfully. Typeform's one-question-at-a-time format encourages thoughtful, specific responses rather than rushed check-boxes.
Connect the form to your HR system, configure separate versions or access links for each respondent group, and use the collected responses to build a development-focused review rather than a one-dimensional performance judgment.
A 360 degree review form collects performance and behavioral feedback on an employee from multiple sources — typically the employee themselves, their manager, peers, and direct reports. The name refers to the full-circle perspective it creates. It's used in performance management and professional development to give employees a richer, more balanced view of how their work and behaviors land with the people around them.
Single-source performance reviews are limited by the reviewer's visibility and relationship with the employee. A 360 degree process captures the employee's full professional impact, surfacing strengths and gaps that wouldn't be visible to any one reviewer alone. It also tends to be more accepted by employees because the feedback comes from multiple sources rather than a single authority.
Cover both competency ratings and behavioral examples:
- How would you rate this person's communication skills with colleagues and stakeholders?
- Does this person follow through on commitments and meet deadlines reliably?
- How effectively does this person collaborate with others to achieve team goals?
- Does this person demonstrate initiative and problem-solving when challenges arise?
- How would you describe the impact this person has on team culture and morale?
- What is one area where this person could focus their development over the next year?
‍
Anonymize responses from peers and direct reports. When people know their specific comments can be traced back to them, they tend to give socially acceptable rather than genuinely useful feedback. Manager responses are typically attributed, but peer and direct report responses should be aggregated before being shared with the employee. Establish clear communication about confidentiality before the review cycle begins.
A typical 360 includes 5 to 10 reviewers across the different relationship categories. Too few reviewers in any category makes it difficult to anonymize peer or direct report feedback meaningfully. Too many can produce noise — reviewers who don't have enough regular interaction with the employee to give informed feedback. Work with the employee and their manager to identify reviewers who have genuine visibility into the competencies being assessed.
Get inspired by relevant templates and categories
3200+ Templates, 300+ Integrations
With Typeform, you can 
customize everything
Change text, colors, and even logos to match the look and feel of your brand. Then embed forms smoothly onto web and email.
Make forms feel effortless to fill out. Pace questions, call people by their name, and adapt the flow based on the data they share.
Stay efficient by connecting forms to your workflow. Typeform integrates with 300+ tools including Slack, Zapier, and HubSpot.
